Home › Pathways › Measure & Report › 1.2 Disclosure
Measure & Report  ·  1.2.2

Regulatory Reporting

Mandatory climate disclosure requirements are rapidly expanding globally, transforming what was voluntary into legal obligation. The EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), SEC climate disclosure rules, and California's SB 253 and SB 261 collectively affect thousands of companies operating in major markets. The maturity pathway progresses from basic regulatory monitoring to proactive compliance infrastructure.

← Back to Pathways

Self-Assessment

Select where your organization currently operates and where you want to get to. There is no obligation to reach "Leading Org." — choose the target that is right for your business context and investment capacity.

📍 Current Level
🎯 Target Level
Select your current and target levels above to map your assessment on this initiative.
Fundamental
Market Standard
Above Average
Leading Org.

Technology

  • Regulatory monitoring process tracking climate disclosure rule developments in all operating jurisdictions
  • Gap assessment comparing current disclosure practices against anticipated regulatory requirements

Process

  • Mapping applicable regulatory regimes including CSRD/ESRS, California SB 253/261, and monitoring SEC rule status ↑ Updated 2026-06-15
  • Conducting readiness assessment against CSRD/ESRS and California SB 253/261 requirements as applicable ↑ Updated 2026-06-15
  • Identifying data gaps between current GHG inventory and regulated disclosure requirements (e.g., Scope 3 under CSRD)

Financing

  • Internal legal and sustainability team time for regulatory monitoring and gap assessment
  • External legal counsel engaged to interpret applicability and compliance timeline by jurisdiction

Technology

  • Fundamental Technologies +
  • CSRD double materiality assessment completed using revised EFRAG guidance with reduced mandatory datapoints ↑ Updated 2026-06-15
  • California SB 253 Scope 1/2 reporting system configured for August 2026 CARB submission deadline ↑ Updated 2026-06-15

Process

  • Completing ESRS double materiality assessment identifying material sustainability topics from both impact and financial perspectives
  • Establishing a cross-functional regulatory compliance team: legal, finance, sustainability, and IR
  • Aligning GHG inventory methodology to regulatory specifications (e.g., Scope 3 mandatory categories under CSRD)

Financing

  • External CSRD readiness advisor engaged ($100K–500K) to support double materiality and ESRS gap analysis
  • Finance function engaged to integrate climate metrics into financial statement footnotes and management commentary

Technology

  • Market Standard Technologies +
  • CSRD-compliant sustainability statement integrated into annual report with ESRS disclosures
  • Limited assurance obtained on sustainability statement from statutory auditor or accredited verifier

Process

  • Climate disclosure filed under applicable state law with Scope 1, 2, and material Scope 3 data assured ↑ Updated 2026-06-15
  • California SB 253 Scope 1/2 report filed by August 2026 deadline; Scope 3 planning underway for 2027 ↑ Updated 2026-06-15
  • Internal controls over sustainability reporting (ICSR) documented and reviewed by internal audit
  • California SB 261 climate-related financial risk report filed using TCFD-aligned framework ↑ Updated 2026-06-15

Financing

  • Compliance costs ($200K–1M+) treated as regulatory cost of doing business, tracked separately in sustainability budget
  • D&O and climate liability insurance coverage reviewed in light of increased regulatory liability exposure

Technology

  • Above Average Technologies +
  • Unified global regulatory reporting platform producing compliant outputs for all applicable jurisdictions from single data set
  • Reasonable assurance obtained on full sustainability statement across all ESRS disclosure requirements

Process

  • Using regulatory compliance as floor, not ceiling — voluntary disclosures consistently exceed mandatory minimums
  • Engaging regulators proactively in consultation processes to shape implementation guidance and technical standards
  • Publishing a regulatory compliance roadmap in sustainability report showing how requirements are being met ahead of deadlines
  • Monitoring PROTECT USA Act and similar legislation that could affect cross-border sustainability compliance ↑ Updated 2026-06-15

Financing

  • Early compliance treated as competitive advantage in regulated markets, reducing regulatory risk premium for investors
  • Regulatory reporting infrastructure investment offset by avoided penalties, audit efficiency, and investor confidence premium
Next Pathway: Target Setting  →

Related Pathways

← All Pathways 5.2.1 Voluntary Frameworks 5.2.3 Target Setting 5.3.1 Third-Party Verification